MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401731770 · doi:10.1681/asn.0000000000000468

Long-Term Kidney Outcomes in Children with Posterior Urethral Valves

2024· article· en· W4401731770 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Cal Robinson, Mandy Rickard, Nivethika Jeyakumar, G. Smith, Juliane Richter, Tim Van Mieghem, Joana Dos Santos, Rahul Chanchlani, Armando J. Lorenzo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalImpactInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesHospital for Sick ChildrenMcMaster UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreLawson Health Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsTerm (time)MedicineKidneyNephrologyUrologyIntensive care medicineSurgeryInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points Among 727 children with posterior urethral valves, 32% had major adverse kidney events (death, kidney failure, or CKD) over a median of 14.2-year follow-up. Children with posterior urethral valves were at substantially higher risks of kidney failure, CKD, and hypertension than the general population. This justifies close kidney health surveillance among children with posterior urethral valves and optimized transitions to adult urologic care. Background Posterior urethral valves represent the most common cause of lower urinary tract obstruction in male infants (approximately 1/4000 live births). Long-term kidney outcomes of posterior urethral valves remain uncertain. We aimed to determine the time-varying risk of major adverse kidney events (MAKE) following children with posterior urethral valves into adulthood. Methods A population-based retrospective cohort study of all male children (<2 years) diagnosed with posterior urethral valves between 1991 and 2021 in Ontario, Canada. Comparator cohorts were ( 1 ) male general population and ( 2 ) male children with pyeloplasty (both <2 years). The primary outcome was MAKE (death, long-term KRT [dialysis or kidney transplant], or CKD). Time to MAKE was analyzed using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. We censored for provincial emigration or administrative censoring (March 31, 2022). Results We included 727 children with posterior urethral valves, 855 pyeloplasty comparators, and 1,013,052 general population comparators. The median follow-up time was 16.6 years (Q1–3, 8.6–24.5) overall. Throughout follow-up, 32% of children with posterior urethral valves developed MAKE versus 1% of the general population and 6% of pyeloplasty comparators. Their adjusted hazard ratio for MAKE was 36.6 (95% confidence interval, 31.6 to 42.4) versus the general population. The risk of developing MAKE declined over the first 5 years after posterior urethral valve diagnosis but remained elevated for >30-year follow-up. Children with posterior urethral valves were also at higher risk of death, CKD, long-term KRT, hypertension, and AKI than the general population or pyeloplasty comparators. Conclusions Children with posterior urethral valves are at higher risk of adverse long-term kidney outcomes well into adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesFrench-language works237,207