MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401746461 · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.15003

Structural basis of sugar recognition by <scp> SCF <sup>FBS2</sup> </scp> ubiquitin ligase involved in <scp>NGLY1</scp> deficiency

2024· article· en· W4401746461 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tadashi Satoh, Maho Yagi‐Utsumi, Nozomi Ishii, Tsunehiro Mizushima, Hirokazu Yagi, Ryuichi Kato, Yuriko Tachida, Hiroaki Tateno, Ichiro Matsuo, Koichi Kato, Tadashi Suzuki, Yukiko Yoshida

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersExploratory Research Center on Life and Living Systems, National Institutes of Natural SciencesCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyInstitute for Protein Research, Osaka UniversityCanadian Glycomics NetworkJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsSugarFood scienceUbiquitin ligaseChemistryBiochemistryUbiquitin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cytosolic peptide: N ‐glycanase (PNGase) is involved in the quality control of N ‐glycoproteins via the endoplasmic reticulum‐associated degradation (ERAD) pathway. Mutations in the gene encoding cytosolic PNGase ( NGLY1 in humans) cause NGLY1 deficiency. Recent findings indicate that the F‐box protein FBS2 of the SCF FBS2 ubiquitin ligase complex can be a promising drug target for NGLY1 deficiency. Here, we determined the crystal structure of bovine FBS2 complexed with the adaptor protein SKP1 and a sugar ligand, Man 3 GlcNAc 2 , which corresponds to the core pentasaccharide of N ‐glycan. Our crystallographic data together with NMR data revealed the structural basis of disparate sugar‐binding specificities in homologous FBS proteins and identified a potential druggable pocket for in silico docking studies. Our results provide a potential basis for the development of selective inhibitors against FBS2 in NGLY1 deficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207