NeoMS: Mass Spectrometry-Based Method for Uncovering Mutated MHC-I Neoantigens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules play a critical role in the immune system by presenting peptides on the cell surface for recognition by T-cells. Tumor cells often produce MHC peptides with amino acid mutations, known as neoantigens, which evade T-cell recognition, leading to rapid tumor growth. In immunotherapies such as TCR-T and CAR-T, identifying these mutated MHC peptide sequences is crucial. Current mass spectrometry-based peptide identification methods primarily rely on database searching, which fails to detect mutated peptides not present in human databases. In this paper, we propose a novel workflow called NeoMS, designed to efficiently identify both non-mutated and mutated MHC-I peptides from mass spectrometry data. NeoMS utilizes a tagging algorithm to generate an expanded sequence database that includes potential mutated proteins for each sample. Furthermore, it employs a machine learning-based scoring function for each peptide-spectrum match (PSM) to maximize search sensitivity. Finally, a rigorous target-decoy approach is implemented to control the false discovery rates (FDR) of the peptides with and without mutations separately. Experimental results for regular peptides demonstrate that NeoMS outperforms four benchmark methods. For mutated peptides, NeoMS successfully identifies hundreds of high-quality mutated peptides in a melanoma-associated sample, with their validity confirmed by further studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".