MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401747011 · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2024.3447746

NeoMS: Mass Spectrometry-Based Method for Uncovering Mutated MHC-I Neoantigens

2024· article· en· W4401747011 on OpenAlexaff
Shaokai Wang, Ming Zhu, Bin Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMass spectrometryComputational biologyMajor histocompatibility complexChemistryComputer scienceBiologyChromatographyAntigenGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules play a critical role in the immune system by presenting peptides on the cell surface for recognition by T-cells. Tumor cells often produce MHC peptides with amino acid mutations, known as neoantigens, which evade T-cell recognition, leading to rapid tumor growth. In immunotherapies such as TCR-T and CAR-T, identifying these mutated MHC peptide sequences is crucial. Current mass spectrometry-based peptide identification methods primarily rely on database searching, which fails to detect mutated peptides not present in human databases. In this paper, we propose a novel workflow called NeoMS, designed to efficiently identify both non-mutated and mutated MHC-I peptides from mass spectrometry data. NeoMS utilizes a tagging algorithm to generate an expanded sequence database that includes potential mutated proteins for each sample. Furthermore, it employs a machine learning-based scoring function for each peptide-spectrum match (PSM) to maximize search sensitivity. Finally, a rigorous target-decoy approach is implemented to control the false discovery rates (FDR) of the peptides with and without mutations separately. Experimental results for regular peptides demonstrate that NeoMS outperforms four benchmark methods. For mutated peptides, NeoMS successfully identifies hundreds of high-quality mutated peptides in a melanoma-associated sample, with their validity confirmed by further studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsSame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207