SPT-Swin: A Shifted Patch Tokenization Swin Transformer for Image Classification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, the transformer-based model e.g., the vision transformer (ViT) has been extensively used in computer vision tasks. The superior performance of the ViT leads to the requirement of an enormous dataset and the complexity of calculating self-attention between patches is quadratic in nature. To acknowledge these two concerns, this paper proposes a novel shifted patch tokenization swin transformer (SPT-Swin) for the image classification task. The shifted patch tokenization (SPT) compensates for the data deficiency by increasing the data samples based on spatial information of the image patches while the swin transformer provides linear computational complexity by calculating self-attention between the shifted window based patches. For model validation, the SPT-Swin framework is trained on popular benchmark image datasets such as ImageNet-1K, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, and the classification accuracies are found 89.45%, 95.67% and 92.95% respectively. Moreover, the comparative analysis of the proposed model with the existing state-of-the-art models shows that the classification performances are improved by 7.05%, 4.14%, and 8.30% for the ImageNet-1K, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets respectively. Therefore, our proposed SPT-based data augmentation technique with the core swin transformer model could be a data-efficient linear complex-able model for future computer vision tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it