MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401749187 · doi:10.1002/slct.202401809

Synthesis, Conformational Properties and DFT Computational Studies of [3]Metacyclo[3](1,3)pyrenophanes

2024· article· en· W4401749187 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Monarul Islam, Bigyan Sharma, Chuan‐Zeng Wang, Shofiur Rahman, Abdullah N. Alodhayb, Paris E. Georghiou, M.R.J. Elsegood, Takehiko Yamato

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistrySelect · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryConformational isomerismDensity functional theoryAdductComputational chemistrySolid-stateCrystal structureStereochemistryCrystallographyMoleculePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two new 6,17‐di‐ tert ‐butyl‐[3]metacyclo[3](1,3)‐pyrenophane‐2,11‐diones 8 a – b were synthesized by the coupling reaction of 1,3‐bis(bromomethyl)‐7‐ tert ‐butylpyrene 5 with the corresponding TosMIC‐adducts 7 a – b in CH 2 Cl 2 and water under phase‐transfer conditions, followed by acid treatment. Wolff–Kishner reduction of 8 a – b afforded in good yields the corresponding 6,17‐di‐ tert ‐butyl‐[3]metacyclo[3](1,3)‐pyrenophanes 9 a – b . The spectroscopic data of both 8 a and 8 b show that they adopt anti ‐conformations. In contrast, both pyrenophanes 9 a and 9 b adopt syn ‐conformations. Variable‐temperature 1 H NMR studies were carried out to determine the conformational behavior of the pyrenophanes. A single crystal X‐ray structure of 8 a shows that it also has an anti ‐conformation in the solid state. Density functional theory (DFT) computations of 8 a – b and 9 a – b were used to determine their energy‐minimized structures and the total energies of their different conformers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistrySelectSame topicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207