Estimating the severity of obstructive sleep apnea during wakefulness using speech: A review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic breathing disorder during sleep that affects 10-30% of adults in North America. The gold standard for diagnosing OSA is polysomnography (PSG). However, PSG has several drawbacks, for example, it is a cumbersome and expensive procedure, which can be quite inconvenient for patients. Additionally, patients often have to endure long waitlists before they can undergo PSG. As a result, other alternatives for screening OSA have gained attention. Speech, as an accessible modality, is generated by variations in the pharyngeal airway, vocal tract, and soft tissues in the pharynx, which shares similar anatomical structures that contribute to OSA. Consequently, in this study, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the existing research on the use of speech for estimating the severity of OSA. In this regard, a total of 851 papers were initially identified from the PubMed database using a specified set of keywords defined by population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) criteria, along with a concatenated graph of the 5 most cited papers in the field extracted from ConnectedPapers platform. Following a rigorous filtering process that considered the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) approach, 32 papers were ultimately included in this review. Among these, 28 papers primarily focused on developing methodology, while the remaining 4 papers delved into the clinical perspective of the association between OSA and speech. In the next step, we investigate the physiological similarities between OSA and speech. Subsequently, we highlight the features extracted from speech, the employed feature selection techniques, and the details of the developed models to predict OSA severity. By thoroughly discussing the current findings and limitations of studies in the field, we provide valuable insights into the gaps that need to be addressed in future research directions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.016 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".