MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401762943 · doi:10.5430/jct.v13n4p247

Innovative of Cultural Education Learning Management through Traditional Invention of Lanterns to Promote Sustainability Citizenship of Secondary School Students in Cultural World Heritage Area, Hoi an, Viet Nam

2024· article· en· W4401762943 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nuengruethai Chantharakhami, Supachai Singyabuth, Nguyen Thi Thanh Thao, Le Thi Hoai Thuong, Wantanee Nachaingern, Cao Thi Hong Van

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum and Teaching · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMahasarakham University
KeywordsCitizenshipSustainabilityCultural heritageNonprobability samplingCultural sustainabilitySociologyCultural identityPublic relationsSocial sciencePolitical sciencePoliticsEcologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this research were to: 1) study the cultural identity of the traditional invention of lanterns of Hoi An, Vietnam; 2) design and develop guidelines for cultural education learning management through traditional invention of lanterns to promote sustainability citizenship of high school students in world cultural heritage areas and 3) study the results of using the guidelines for cultural education learning management through traditional invention of lanterns to promote sustainability citizenship of high school students in world cultural heritage areas. The research was a participatory action research. Samples in the research included 1) a group of 25 people providing information about the cultural identity of the traditional invention of lanterns, 2) a group of 9 cultural education experts, and 3) an experimental group using the guidelines for learning management, namely high school students in the World Cultural Heritage Area of Hoi An, Vietnam, accounting for 150 people using purposive sampling, totaling 184 people. The research tools used were unstructured interviews. quality assessment forms of the learning management guidelines, sustainability citizenship assessment forms, and focus group discussion recording forms. The research results revealed that: 1) From studying the cultural identity of the traditional invention of lanterns in Hoi An, Vietnam, it was found that the cultural identity of the traditional invention of lanterns in Hoi An, Vietnam is associated with the way of life connected to nature and social values passed down from ancestors. This is one of the important identities that drive the culture and the economy of the people in Hoi An, which is a world cultural heritage city that shows its relationship with the context of being a world cultural heritage city and the way of life that is attached with the nature and the simple way of life that has been passed down from ancestors. 2) From designing and developing the guidelines for cultural education learning management through the traditional invention of lanterns to promote sustainability citizenship of high school students in the world cultural heritage area, it was found that the researcher had designed and developed the guidelines for cultural education learning management through the cultural identity of the traditional invention to promote sustainability citizenship called the cultural education learning process of the IOAR model consisting of 1) creating inspiration (Inspirations), 2) Creating options (Options), 3) Practice (Action) and 4) Reflections and the overall suitability evaluation results were at a high level. 3) Studying the results of using the guidelines for cultural education learning management through the traditional invention of lanterns to promote sustainability citizenship of high school students in the world cultural heritage areas revealed that the high school students had the overall sustainability citizenship at the highest level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Curriculum and TeachingSame topicEducational Practices and ChallengesFrench-language works237,207