Remote sensing for estimating genetic parameters of biomass accumulation and modeling stability of growth curves in alfalfa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multispectral imaging by unoccupied aerial vehicles provides a nondestructive, high-throughput approach to measure biomass accumulation over successive alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. subsp. sativa) harvests. Information from estimated growth curves can be used to infer harvest biomass and to gain insights into the relationship between growth dynamics and forage biomass stability across cuttings and years. In this study, multispectral imaging and several common vegetation indices were used to estimate genetic parameters and model growth of alfalfa cultivars to determine the longitudinal relationship between vegetation indices and forage biomass. Results showed moderate heritability for vegetation indices, with median plot level heritability ranging from 0.11 to 0.64, across multiple cuttings in three trials planted in Ithaca, NY, and Las Cruces, NM. Genetic correlations between the normalized difference vegetation index and forage biomass were moderate to high across trials, cuttings, and the timing of multispectral image capture. To evaluate the relationship between growth parameters and forage biomass stability across cuttings and environmental conditions, random regression modeling approaches were used to estimate the growth parameters of cultivars for each cutting and the variance in growth was compared to the variance in genetic estimates of forage biomass yield across cuttings. These analyses revealed high correspondence between stability in growth parameters and stability of forage yield. The results of this study indicate that vegetation indices are effective at modeling genetic components of biomass accumulation, presenting opportunities for more efficient screening of cultivars and new longitudinal modeling approaches that can provide insights into temporal factors influencing cultivar stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".