MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401781071 · doi:10.1130/b37092.1

Stratigraphic record of tectonic and climatic impact on orogenic growth: An example from the Hexi Corridor Basin, NE Tibetan Plateau

2024· article· en· W4401781071 on OpenAlexaff
Baotian Pan, Haopeng Geng, Joel E. Saylor, Feng Cheng, Dianbao Chen, Lin Li, Ziyi Xu, Liwei Jian, Junsheng Nie

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPlateau (mathematics)TectonicsStructural basinPaleontologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The locus of shortening, accretion, and erosion are key components in modulating the rate, pattern, and magnitude of orogenic wedge growth, but separating their respective roles in the evolution of wedge taper is often difficult because of the absence of exhumation and uplift data from the mountains. However, such information can be preserved in the adjacent basins, and a combination of sediment provenance and accumulation rate records may be able to distinguish tectonic versus climatically caused orogenic wedge evolution. Here we present a joint sediment accumulation rate (SAR) and provenance analysis based on zircon U-Pb ages and heavy mineral composition of a drill core from the foreland of the Qilian Shan (i.e., Hexi Corridor Basin, NE Tibetan Plateau) with the aim to reveal the evolution of the Qilian orogenic wedge and its relationship to tectonics and climate. The provenance data show a gradual increase in sediment attributable to the Yumu Shan in the toe of the orogenic wedge and associated decrease in contribution from the high-elevation hinterland Zoulang Nan Shan source between 7 Ma and 3 Ma, followed by a reverse of these trends from 3 Ma to the modern. The increased contribution from the toe of the orogenic wedge (Yumu Shan) is accompanied by an increase in SAR, and we interpret this joint signal as the result of in-sequence thrusting, which caused flexural subsidence and created more deposition space in the bounding foreland. The increased contribution from the hinterland from 3.0 Ma to 1.8 Ma, accompanied with the decreased SAR, is attributed to the onset of Northern Hemisphere glaciation, which increased glacial erosion of the high-elevation hinterland areas and caused erosional unloading of the orogenic wedge, leading to flexural uplift in the foreland and reduced SAR. After 1.8 Ma, continued increase in the contribution from the hinterland accompanied with the SAR increase is less straightforward to interpret. We suspect that glacial erosion might have activated fault movements in the hinterland area, and tectonic-caused rock uplift was faster than glacial erosion. Therefore, high sediment flux from the hinterland was maintained but flexural subsidence accelerated. Our results demonstrate that both tectonics and climate have shaped regional landscape evolution and emphasize the role of glacial erosion in accounting for orogenic wedge evolution at ca. 3 Ma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207