MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401798793 · doi:10.1016/s2666-5247(24)00126-5

Early warning COVID-19 outbreak in long-term care facilities using wastewater surveillance: correlation, prediction, and interaction with clinical and serological statuses

2024· article· en· W4401798793 on OpenAlexaffabout
Xiaoli Pang, Bonita E. Lee, Tiejun Gao, Rhonda J. Rosychuk, Linnet Immaraj, Judy Qiu, Jiabi Wen, Nathan Zelyas, Krista Howden, Janelle Wallace, Eleanor Risling, Lorie A Little, John Kim, Heidi Wood, Alyssia Robinson, Michael D. Parkins, Casey R. J. Hubert, Kevin J. Frankowski, Steve E. Hrudey, Christopher Sikora

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Microbe · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Canadian institutionsCanadian Bio-Systems (Canada)Alberta Health ServicesProvincial Laboratory of Public HealthUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutbreakCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)SerologyWarning systemTerm (time)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Environmental healthMedicineVirologyComputer scienceImmunologyInternal medicineAntibodyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the strategic value of wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) of SARS-CoV-2. This multisite 28-month-long study focused on WBS for older residents in 12 long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Edmonton (AB, Canada) by assessing relationships between COVID-19, WBS, and serostatus during the pandemic. METHODS: Wastewater samples collected two to three times per week were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-quantitative PCR. The serostatus of antibodies was examined using immunoassays. The data of clinical COVID-19 outbreaks based on extensive testing were obtained from local public health officials. Analyses included calculating correlations between 7-day rolling averages for WBS and COVID-19 cases and investigating whether WBS led or lagged confirmed outbreaks using a multinomial test. FINDINGS: Wastewater results correlated well with clinical COVID-19 infections and outbreaks at participating LTCFs. 1058 (36·0%) of 2936 collected wastewater samples were SARS-CoV-2 positive, compared with 1247 people (resident n=671, staff n=572, and unknown n=4) reporting positive test results of 21 673 clinical samples assessed (5·8%). WBS led clinical testing in 32 (60·4%) confirmed outbreaks, which was significantly different from WBS lagged (12 outbreaks [22·6%, 95% CI 11·3-33·7]). Non-detection of WBS SARS-CoV-2 served as a negative predictor for outbreaks. WBS results attested protective immunity in vaccinated individuals before the omicron wave. A parallel increase in the proportions of positive WBS SARS-CoV-2 and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies underlined that omicron was an immunity-evading variant despite high seropositivity of neutralising antibodies after multiple doses of vaccine. INTERPRETATION: Implementation of WBS could enable targeted clinical investigations and improve cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 outbreak management in LTCFs. WBS and serostatus provided informed dynamic changes of infections and immunity. Critical evidence was that LTCF WBS is an effective early warning system to support rapid public health outbreak management and protect vulnerable older populations. FUNDING: Canadian Immunity Task Force for COVID-19 and Alberta Health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet MicrobeSame topicSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingFrench-language works237,207