Acral Fibrochondromyxoid Tumor: A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Genetic Study of 37 Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acral fibrochondromyxoid tumor (AFCMT) is a recently described likely benign mesenchymal neoplasm arising in the distal extremities with distinctive histologic features and a recurrent THBS1::ADGRF5 fusion. We studied an additional 37 cases of AFCMT and expanded on the so-far reported clinicopathologic and molecular findings. Tumors occurred in 21 females and 16 males, ranging in age from 17 to 78 years (median age: 47), and solely involved the hands (24/37, 65%) or feet (13/37, 35%). Histologic examination revealed well-delineated uni- or multinodular tumors with prominent vasculature-rich septa and bland, chondrocyte-like tumor cells set within abundant chondromyxoid stroma. Immunohistochemical studies showed that tumor cells were positive for CD34 (25/27; 93%) and ERG (27/27; 100%), whereas negative for S100 protein (0/31). Molecular analysis revealed evidence of a THBS1::ADGRF5 fusion in 17 of 19 (89%) successfully tested tumors. Clinical follow-up was available in 8 cases (median: 97 months), with multiple local recurrences in 1 case at 276, 312, and 360 months. We conclude that AFCMT is a distinct entity with reproducible morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features that should be differentiated from other similar appearing acral mesenchymal neoplasms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".