MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401813624 · doi:10.2196/58105

Effect of Smoking on the Development of Migraine in Women: Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea

2024· article· en· W4401813624 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Seung Ae Kim, Kyungdo Han, Soyoun Choi, Michelle Sojung Youn, Hyemin Jang, Mi Ji Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMigraineHazard ratioProportional hazards modelSmoking cessationProspective cohort studyCohort studyDemographyRisk factorLongitudinal studyCohortConfidence intervalInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Smoking is known to be a significant risk factor for various diseases. Migraine, a condition requiring careful lifestyle management, currently lacks specific guidelines advocating for smoking cessation as a preventive measure. Although cross-sectional studies have suggested a potential link between smoking and an increased risk of migraine, the findings have been inconsistent and conflicting. To date, there has been no longitudinal study which investigated the effect of smoking on the risk of migraine in a prospective setting. Objective: This longitudinal study aimed to investigate the impact of smoking on the incidence of migraine in women and examine the modifying effect of menopausal status. Methods: Using nationally representative National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data, women aged ≥40 years who participated in national breast cancer screening in 2009 were followed-up until the end of 2019. Baseline data on smoking status (non-, ex-, and current smoker) as well as the duration and amount of cigarette smoking were collected. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to examine the independent effect of smoking on the risk of incident migraine after adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and female reproductive factors. The results were stratified by menopausal status, and an interaction analysis (smoking × menopause) was performed. Results: In total, 1,827,129 women were included in the analysis. Women with a history of smoking exhibited a higher risk of developing migraine, compared with nonsmokers. Specifically, a higher risk of migraine was observed in women with past (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.044, 95% CI 1.000-1.089) and current cigarette use (adjusted HR 1.050, 95% CI, 1.023-1.079) than in nonsmokers. The effect was greater in premenopausal women (adjusted HR 1.140, 95% CI, 1.108-1.172) than in postmenopausal women (adjusted HR 1.045, 95% CI 1.018-1.073; P<.001). The risk increased with an increased amount of smoking, with a greater association in premenopausal women (P<.001). Conclusions: Smoking increases the risk of migraine in women, with a dose-dependent relationship. Menopause modifies this effect. Our findings suggest that smoking is an important modifiable risk factor of migraine, with a higher impact in premenopausal women. The interaction between smoking and estrogen may increase the vulnerability of the migraine brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Public Health and SurveillanceSame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207