MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401815400 · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101037

COVID-19 diagnosis, vaccination during pregnancy, and adverse pregnancy outcomes of 865,654 women in England and Wales: a population-based cohort study

2024· article· en· W4401815400 on OpenAlexafffund
Elena Raffetti, Thomas Bolton, John Nolan, Luisa Zuccolo, Rachel Denholm, Gordon C. S. Smith, Ashley Akbari, Katie Harron, Gwenetta Curry, Elias Allara, Massimo Caputo, Hoda Abbasizanjani, Tim Chico, Angela Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Regional Health - Europe · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersProvidence Health Care Research InstituteHealth Data Research UKArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical SciencesCentre For Medical Engineering, King’s College LondonNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreWales Institute of Social and Economic Research and DataInnovative Medicines InitiativeForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och VälfärdOffice of the Chief Scientist, Ministry of EconomyWellcome TrustIrish Heart FoundationBHF Centre of Research Excellence, OxfordUCLH Biomedical Research CentreEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social ScienceHealth and Social Care Research and Development DivisionPublic Health AgencyEconomic and Social Research CouncilSwansea UniversityCardiff UniversityMedical Research CouncilDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchVetenskapsrådetWelsh Ambulance Services NHS TrustSwedish Foundation for MS ResearchUK Research and InnovationGovernment of the United KingdomSwedish Council of AmericaPublic Health WalesWellcomeAlan Turing InstituteBritish Heart FoundationBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Regenerative MedicineChief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care DirectorateScottish GovernmentHDR FoundationMental Health Research UKHealth Sciences Centre Foundation
KeywordsPregnancyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineCohortVaccinationObstetricsCohort study2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PopulationAdverse effectPandemicDemographyVirologyEnvironmental healthOutbreakInternal medicineDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)BiologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The extent to which COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination during pregnancy are associated with risks of common and rare adverse pregnancy outcomes remains uncertain. We compared the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with and without COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination during pregnancy. Methods: We studied population-scale linked electronic health records for women with singleton pregnancies in England and Wales from 1 August 2019 to 31 December 2021. This time period was divided at 8th December 2020 into pre-vaccination and vaccination roll-out eras. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for common and rare pregnancy outcomes according to the time since COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination and by pregnancy trimester and COVID-19 variant. Findings: Amongst 865,654 pregnant women, we recorded 60,134 (7%) COVID-19 diagnoses and 182,120 (21%) adverse pregnancy outcomes. COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of gestational diabetes (adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.18-1.26), gestational hypertension (1.16, 1.10-1.22), pre-eclampsia (1.20, 1.12-1.28), preterm birth (1.63, 1.57-1.69, and 1.68, 1.61-1.75 for spontaneous preterm), very preterm birth (2.04, 1.86-2.23), small for gestational age (1.12, 1.07-1.18), thrombotic venous events (1.85, 1.56-2.20) and stillbirth (only within 14-days since COVID-19 diagnosis, 3.39, 2.23-5.15). HRs were more pronounced in the pre-vaccination era, within 14-days since COVID-19 diagnosis, when COVID-19 diagnosis occurred in the 3rd trimester, and in the original variant era. There was no evidence to suggest COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Instead, dose 1 of COVID-19 vaccine was associated with lower risks of preterm birth (0.90, 0.86-0.95), very preterm birth (0.84, 0.76-0.94), small for gestational age (0.93, 0.88-0.99), and stillbirth (0.67, 0.49-0.92). Interpretation: Pregnant women with a COVID-19 diagnosis have higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings support recommendations towards high-priority vaccination against COVID-19 in pregnant women. Funding: BHF, ESRC, Forte, HDR-UK, MRC, NIHR and VR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Regional Health - EuropeSame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207