← Back to cohort
One hundred years of EEG for brain and behaviour research
Faisal Mushtaq, Dominik Welke, Ann Gallagher, Yuri G. Pavlov, Layla Kouara, Jorge Bosch‐Bayard, Jasper J.F. van den Bosch, Mahnaz Arvaneh, Amy R. Bland, Maximilien Chaumon, Cornelius Borck, Xun He, Steven J. Luck, Maro G. Machizawa, Cyril Pernet, Aina Puce, Sidney J. Segalowitz, Christine Rogers, Muhammad Awais, Claudio Babiloni, Neil W. Bailey, Sylvain Baillet, Robert C. A. Bendall, Daniel Brady, Maria L. Bringas-Vega, Niko A. Busch, Ana Calzada‐Reyes, Armand Chatard, Peter E. Clayson, Michael X Cohen, Jonathan Cole, Martin Constant, Alexandra Corneyllie, Damien Coyle, Damian Cruse, Ioannis Delis, Arnaud Delorme, Damien A. Fair, Tiago H. Falk, Matthias Gamer, Giorgio Ganis, Kilian Gloy, Samantha Gregory, Cameron D. Hassall, Katherine Hiley, Richard B. Ivry, Karim Jerbi, Michael W. Jenkins, Jakob Kaiser, Andreas Keil, Robert T. Knight, Silvia Kochen, Boris Kotchoubey, Olave E. Krigolson, Nicolas Langer, Heinrich R. Liesefeld, Sarah Lippé, Raquel E. London, Annmarie MacNamara, Scott Makeig, Welber Marinovic, Aleya A. Marzuki, Ryan Mathew, Christoph M. Michel, José del R. Millán, Mark Mon‐Williams, Lilia María Morales Chacón, Richard Naar, Gustav Nilsonne, Guiomar Niso, Erika Nyhus, Robert Oostenveld, Katharina Paul, Walter Paulus, Daniela M. Pfabigan, Gilles Pourtois, Stefan Rampp, Manuel Rausch, Kay A. Robbins, Paolo Maria Rossini, Manuela Ruzzoli, Barbara Schmidt, Magdalena Senderecka, Narayanan Srinivasan, Yannik Stegmann, Paul M. Thompson, Mitchell Valdés-Sosa, Melle J. W. van der Molen, Domenica Veniero, Edelyn Verona, Bradley Voytek, Dezhong Yao, Alan C. Evans, Pedro A. Valdés‐Sosa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
Bibliographic record
VenueNature Human Behaviour · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaMcGill UniversityMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence InstituteMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBrock UniversityUniversité de MontréalMacEwan UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilTartu ÜlikoolIkerbasque, Basque Foundation for ScienceUniversität ZürichUniversity of California, DavisUniversité de GenèveUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaUniversitetet i BergenUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversität zu LübeckWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterUniversitätsklinikum JenaSapienza Università di RomaMacEwan UniversityInstituo CajalChengdu Science and Technology BureauBrock UniversityConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasUniversiteit LeidenEberhard Karls Universität TübingenIndian Institute of Technology KanpurUniversité de MontréalCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCurtin University of TechnologyUlster UniversityUniversität BremenDirectorate for Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaUniversity of South FloridaLeeds Biomedical Research CentreFondation Brain CanadaUniversity of BathUniversitätsmedizin GöttingenResearch Councils UKMcGill UniversityGentofte HospitalDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of LeedsNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAustralian National UniversityKarolinska InstitutetKatholische Universität Eichstätt-IngolstadtBowdoin CollegeManchester Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Salford ManchesterUniversity of MinnesotaSorbonne UniversitéUK Research and InnovationUniversiteit GentSunway UniversityUniversity of Texas at San AntonioTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityRadboud UniversiteitJulius-Maximilians-Universität WürzburgUniversity of Texas at AustinBournemouth UniversityUniversity of Southern California
KeywordsElectroencephalographyDemocratizationAction (physics)PsychologyCognitive scienceCognitive psychologyNeurosciencePolitical scienceDemocracyLaw
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.598
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations50
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno