← Back to cohort
One hundred years of EEG for brain and behaviour research
Faisal Mushtaq, Dominik Welke, Ann Gallagher, Yuri G. Pavlov, Layla Kouara, Jorge Bosch‐Bayard, Jasper J.F. van den Bosch, Mahnaz Arvaneh, Amy R. Bland, Maximilien Chaumon, Cornelius Borck, Xun He, Steven J. Luck, Maro G. Machizawa, Cyril Pernet, Aina Puce, Sidney J. Segalowitz, Christine Rogers, Muhammad Awais, Claudio Babiloni, Neil W. Bailey, Sylvain Baillet, Robert C. A. Bendall, Daniel Brady, Maria L. Bringas-Vega, Niko A. Busch, Ana Calzada‐Reyes, Armand Chatard, Peter E. Clayson, Michael X Cohen, Jonathan Cole, Martin Constant, Alexandra Corneyllie, Damien Coyle, Damian Cruse, Ioannis Delis, Arnaud Delorme, Damien A. Fair, Tiago H. Falk, Matthias Gamer, Giorgio Ganis, Kilian Gloy, Samantha Gregory, Cameron D. Hassall, Katherine Hiley, Richard B. Ivry, Karim Jerbi, Michael W. Jenkins, Jakob Kaiser, Andreas Keil, Robert T. Knight, Silvia Kochen, Boris Kotchoubey, Olave E. Krigolson, Nicolas Langer, Heinrich R. Liesefeld, Sarah Lippé, Raquel E. London, Annmarie MacNamara, Scott Makeig, Welber Marinovic, Aleya A. Marzuki, Ryan Mathew, Christoph M. Michel, José del R. Millán, Mark Mon‐Williams, Lilia María Morales Chacón, Richard Naar, Gustav Nilsonne, Guiomar Niso, Erika Nyhus, Robert Oostenveld, Katharina Paul, Walter Paulus, Daniela M. Pfabigan, Gilles Pourtois, Stefan Rampp, Manuel Rausch, Kay A. Robbins, Paolo Maria Rossini, Manuela Ruzzoli, Barbara Schmidt, Magdalena Senderecka, Narayanan Srinivasan, Yannik Stegmann, Paul M. Thompson, Mitchell Valdés-Sosa, Melle J. W. van der Molen, Domenica Veniero, Edelyn Verona, Bradley Voytek, Dezhong Yao, Alan C. Evans, Pedro A. Valdés‐Sosa
Bibliographic record
VenueNature Human Behaviour · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaMcGill UniversityMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence InstituteMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBrock UniversityUniversité de MontréalMacEwan UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilTartu ÜlikoolIkerbasque, Basque Foundation for ScienceUniversität ZürichUniversity of California, DavisUniversité de GenèveUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaUniversitetet i BergenUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversität zu LübeckWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterUniversitätsklinikum JenaSapienza Università di RomaMacEwan UniversityInstituo CajalChengdu Science and Technology BureauBrock UniversityConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasUniversiteit LeidenEberhard Karls Universität TübingenIndian Institute of Technology KanpurUniversité de MontréalCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCurtin University of TechnologyUlster UniversityUniversität BremenDirectorate for Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaUniversity of South FloridaLeeds Biomedical Research CentreFondation Brain CanadaUniversity of BathUniversitätsmedizin GöttingenResearch Councils UKMcGill UniversityGentofte HospitalDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of LeedsNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAustralian National UniversityKarolinska InstitutetKatholische Universität Eichstätt-IngolstadtBowdoin CollegeManchester Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Salford ManchesterUniversity of MinnesotaSorbonne UniversitéUK Research and InnovationUniversiteit GentSunway UniversityUniversity of Texas at San AntonioTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityRadboud UniversiteitJulius-Maximilians-Universität WürzburgUniversity of Texas at AustinBournemouth UniversityUniversity of Southern California
KeywordsElectroencephalographyDemocratizationAction (physics)PsychologyCognitive scienceCognitive psychologyNeurosciencePolitical scienceDemocracyLaw
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations50
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno