Vascular complications after a multiligament knee reconstruction: A case report highlighting the role of preoperative imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vascular injuries are serious complications of multiligament knee injuries and can result in catastrophic outcomes. These injuries can range from intimal flaps with no compromise of the distal perfusion to a complete occlusion or transection requiring emergent vascular intervention. Several diagnostic tests, including the measurement of the ankle-brachial index (ABI), conventional angiography, and computed tomography angiography (CTA), are commonly used as diagnostic tools to identify vascular injuries in the context of a multiligament knee injury. In this report, the authors discuss the case of a patient with a normal ABI and palpable distal pulses on physical examination who developed limb ischemia after a multiligament knee reconstruction under tourniquet. The patient underwent emergent embolectomy and had a favorable postoperative outcome. During vascular exploration, there was no evidence of injury to the popliteal artery. The two working diagnoses were that either the patient had an intimal flap complicated by the development of a thrombus during surgery or that the initial vascular injury was not detected by ABI and clinical examination. Therefore, intimal flaps in multiligament knee injuries can lead to limb threatening ischemia in the context of reconstructive knee surgery and are likely underdiagnosed with ABI assessment. The utilization of preoperative CTA may help identify these injuries in patients indicated for reconstructive surgeries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".