MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401829755 · doi:10.18280/ria.380422

An Efficacious Hybrid Approach for Diabetic Retinal Pathogen Classification

2024· article· fr· W4401829755 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ramya Navaneethan, Hemavathi Devarajan

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinalPathogenMedicineOphthalmologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetic Retinopathy and Glaucoma are two common diabetic retinal pathogens.It has the potential to damage human retina and result in vision impairment.Based on the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) reports, In India 77 million people were affected with diabetics 2019 and approximately 147.2 million people are expected by 2045.By effectively managing diabetes and undergoing routine eye examinations, would avoid or reduce the risk of eye complications such as diabetic retinopathy, cataracts, and Glaucoma.The Timely identification and precise delineation of affected areas in retinal pathogen images are crucial for effective disease management.To address this, we propose a novel hybrid diabetic retinal pathogen classification mechanism using Artificial Fish Swarm and Deep Convolutional Radial Basis Function network (AFS-DCRBF).This method utilizes retinal images containing normal, Diabetic-Retinopathy, and Glaucoma as inputs.Preprocessing of raw input images is performed using a spatial filtering technique in the initial phase.A vector-auto regression method is then employed for feature engineering, followed by retinal pathogen classification.The Deep-Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) selects most informative traits from the extracted feature sequence, while the Radial Basis Function (RBF) module performs the classification task.The Artificial Fish Swarm (AFS) optimization fine-tunes the hyperparameters of DCRBF and improves classification performance.The proposed study was evaluated using ORIGA data set and publicly available datasets for DR.The proposed method required a total time of 1.12 seconds and achieved 99.40% accuracy and 99.61%specificity, and dice coefficient of 0.97.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207