All-cause mortality and suicide after pediatric traumatic brain injury: a 20-year nationwide study in Finland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess all-cause mortality and suicides after pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted population-based historical cohort study using three nationwide registers from 1998 to 2018 in Finland. All patients that were the age of 0-17 at the time of the pTBI were included. The reference group consisted of children with ankle or wrist fractures. We used Kaplan-Meier and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare all-cause mortality and suicides between groups. RESULTS: After 20 years of follow-up, there were 479 deaths in the pTBI group (0.67% of 71,963) and 306 deaths in the reference group (0.47% of 64,848). In the pTBI group, 28.6% of the deaths occurred after the first follow-up year, compared to 2.6% in the reference group. In all-cause mortality, survival time was slightly less in the pTBI group with age and gender adjustment throughout the follow-up period [20-year RMST ratio: 0.995; CI (0.994-0.996)]. The leading manners of death were suicides (pTBI group = 28.4%; reference group = 45.5%) and traffic collisions (pTBI group = 37.4%; reference group = 20.8%). Age and gender-adjusted survival time was slightly less for those with suicide as a manner of death in the pTBI group [10-year RMST ratio: 0.999; CI (0.999-0.999); 20-year RMST ratio: 0.999; CI (0.998-0.999)]. CONCLUSIONS: Children and adolescents who sustained a TBI have slightly lower long-term survival time for all-cause mortality, most of which occurs during the first year following injury. There is no clinically meaningful difference in deaths by suicide between the two injury groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".