Increase in gross primary production of boreal forests balanced out by increase in ecosystem respiration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes in the net carbon sink of boreal forests constitute a major source of uncertainty in the future global carbon budget and, hence, climate change projections. The annual net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) controlling the terrestrial carbon stock results from the small difference between respiratory CO 2 release and the photosynthetic CO 2 uptake by vegetation. The boreal forest, and the boreal biome in general, is regarded as a persistent and even increasing net carbon sink. However, decreases in photosynthetic CO 2 uptake and/or concurrent increases in respiratory CO 2 release under a changing climate may turn boreal forests from a net sink to a net source of CO 2 . Here, we assessed the interannual variability of the boreal forest net CO 2 sink-source strength and its two component fluxes from 1981 to 2018. Our remote sensing approach - trained by net CO 2 flux observations at eddy covariance sites across the circumpolar boreal forests - employs satellite-derived retrievals of snowmelt timing, landscape freeze-thaw status, and yearly maximum estimates of the normalized difference vegetation index as a proxy for peak vegetation productivity. Our results suggest that for the period 2000–2018, the mean annual evergreen boreal forest CO 2 photosynthetic uptake (gross primary productivity) was 2.8 ± 0.2 Pg C y −1 ( 1.6 ± 0.1 Pg C y −1 for Eurasia and 1.2 ± 0.1 Pg C y −1 for North America). In contrast to earlier studies results obtained here do not indicate a clear increasing trend in the circumpolar evergreen boreal forest CO 2 sink. The increase in photosynthetic CO 2 uptake is compensated by increasing respiratory releases with both component fluxes showing considerable interannual variabilities. • New approach to estimate the interannual dynamics carbon exchange. • Using CO 2 flux observations and satellite data on cryosphere. • Estimates on hemispheric net ecosystem CO 2 uptake and respiration for 1981–2018. • Producing estimates independent of terrestrial biosphere model predictions. • Showing that increases in CO 2 uptake compensated by increased respiratory releases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".