Doppler ultrasound and first trimester pregnancy: not always a happy marriage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Journal Article Doppler ultrasound and first trimester pregnancy: not always a happy marriage Get access Stefania Carlucci, Stefania Carlucci Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Foggia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Ospedali Riuniti", Foggia, Italy Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Christoph Lees, Christoph Lees Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, London, UKCentre for Fetal Care, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2104-5561 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Piero Miloro, Piero Miloro Ultrasound and Underwater Acoustics Group, National Physical Laboratory, London, UK Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Ioannis Papastefanou, Ioannis Papastefanou Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Gail Ter Haar, Gail Ter Haar Physics Department, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8909-0775 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Andrea Dall'Asta On Behalf of the Safety Committee of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology Andrea Dall'Asta Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy Correspondence address. Department of Medicine and Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, Italy. Tel: +39-0521702434; E-mail: andrea.dallasta@unipr.it https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7201-0206 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Human Reproduction, deae176, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae176 Published: 24 August 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".