MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401841736 · doi:10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100094

Development and Testing of Artificial Intelligence-Based Mobile Application to Achieve Cataract Backlog-Free Status in Uttar Pradesh, India

2024· article· en· W4401841736 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsGovernment of ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUttar pradeshCataractsBlindnessOptometryMedicineEnvironmental healthCommunity health workersPopulationGeographySocioeconomicsOphthalmologyHealth servicesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Uttar Pradesh (UP), the most populous state in India, has about 36 million people aged 50 years or older, spread across more than 100,000 villages. Among them, an estimated 3.5 million suffer from visual impairments, including blindness due to untreated cataracts. To achieve cataract backlog-free status, UP is required to screen this population at the community level and provide treatment to those suffering from cataracts. We envisioned an AI-powered primary screening app utilizing eye images, deployable to frontline health workers for community-level screening. This paper outlines insights gained from developing the AI mobile app "Roshni" for cataract screening. METHOD: The AI-based cataract classification model was developed using 13,633 eye images and finalized after three stages of experiments, detecting cataracts in images focused on the eye, iris, and pupil. Overall, 155 experiments were conducted using multiple deep learning algorithms, including ResNet50, ResNet101, YOLOv5, EfficientNetV2, and InceptionV3. We established a minimum threshold of 90 % specificity and sensitivity to ensure the algorithm's suitability for field use. RESULTS: The cataract detection model for eye-focused images achieved 51.9 % sensitivity and 87.6 % specificity, while the model for iris-focused images, using a good/bad iris filter, achieved 52.4 % sensitivity and 93.3 % specificity. The classification model for segmented-pupil images, employing a good/bad pupil filter with UNet-based semantic segmentation model and EfficientNetV2, yielded 96 % sensitivity and 97 % specificity. Field testing with 302 beneficiaries (604 images) showed an overall sensitivity of 86.6 %, specificity of 93.3 %, positive predictive value of 58.4 %, and negative predictive value of 98.5 %. CONCLUSION: This paper details the development of an AI mobile app designed to facilitate community screening for cataracts by frontline health workers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.552
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it