Development and Testing of Artificial Intelligence-Based Mobile Application to Achieve Cataract Backlog-Free Status in Uttar Pradesh, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uttar Pradesh (UP), the most populous state in India, has about 36 million people aged 50 years or older, spread across more than 100,000 villages. Among them, an estimated 3.5 million suffer from visual impairments, including blindness due to untreated cataracts. To achieve cataract backlog-free status, UP is required to screen this population at the community level and provide treatment to those suffering from cataracts. We envisioned an AI-powered primary screening app utilizing eye images, deployable to frontline health workers for community-level screening. This paper outlines insights gained from developing the AI mobile app "Roshni" for cataract screening. METHOD: The AI-based cataract classification model was developed using 13,633 eye images and finalized after three stages of experiments, detecting cataracts in images focused on the eye, iris, and pupil. Overall, 155 experiments were conducted using multiple deep learning algorithms, including ResNet50, ResNet101, YOLOv5, EfficientNetV2, and InceptionV3. We established a minimum threshold of 90 % specificity and sensitivity to ensure the algorithm's suitability for field use. RESULTS: The cataract detection model for eye-focused images achieved 51.9 % sensitivity and 87.6 % specificity, while the model for iris-focused images, using a good/bad iris filter, achieved 52.4 % sensitivity and 93.3 % specificity. The classification model for segmented-pupil images, employing a good/bad pupil filter with UNet-based semantic segmentation model and EfficientNetV2, yielded 96 % sensitivity and 97 % specificity. Field testing with 302 beneficiaries (604 images) showed an overall sensitivity of 86.6 %, specificity of 93.3 %, positive predictive value of 58.4 %, and negative predictive value of 98.5 %. CONCLUSION: This paper details the development of an AI mobile app designed to facilitate community screening for cataracts by frontline health workers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".