MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401854739 · doi:10.34119/bjhrv8n4-320

Prevalência da Retinopatia Diabética em pacientes com Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 na população de Vespasiano

2024· article· pt· W4401854739 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Carolina Dalsecco Alves, Elisa de Castro Correia, Laura Araujo Cunha, Manuela Pittella de Mattos

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Health Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusDiabetic retinopathyOphthalmologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) é uma patologia caracterizada por hiperglicemia, devido a perda progressiva de secreção de insulina pelas células beta pancreáticas. Essa doença está associada a complicações macrovasculares e microvasculares, dentre elas a retinopatia diabética (RD). A RD, frequentemente, está presente na população de idade ativa e é a principal causa de cegueira evitável nos países desenvolvidos. A doença possui início insidioso e alta taxa de progressão sendo relacionada, principalmente, à duração do diabetes e nível de controle glicêmico. Faz-se necessário programas públicos de prevenção, diagnóstico e tratamento precoce que visam a melhora do prognóstico da RD, bem como a redução do risco de dano visual irreversível. Desse modo, no presente estudo foram analisados dados extraídos de prontuários referentes aos pacientes previamente diagnosticados com DM2, que participaram do mutirão de retinopatia diabética ocorrido em 02/07/2022, residentes de Vespasiano, Minas Gerais, que realizam tratamento nas unidades básicas de saúde ou com médicos endocrinologistas do município. Tais dados coletados tem como objetivo primário avaliar a prevalência da retinopatia diabética nessa população.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of Health ReviewSame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207