MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401854739 · doi:10.34119/bjhrv8n4-320

Prevalência da Retinopatia Diabética em pacientes com Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 na população de Vespasiano

2024· article· pt· W4401854739 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Carolina Dalsecco Alves, Elisa de Castro Correia, Laura Araujo Cunha, Manuela Pittella de Mattos

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Health Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusDiabetic retinopathyOphthalmologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) é uma patologia caracterizada por hiperglicemia, devido a perda progressiva de secreção de insulina pelas células beta pancreáticas. Essa doença está associada a complicações macrovasculares e microvasculares, dentre elas a retinopatia diabética (RD). A RD, frequentemente, está presente na população de idade ativa e é a principal causa de cegueira evitável nos países desenvolvidos. A doença possui início insidioso e alta taxa de progressão sendo relacionada, principalmente, à duração do diabetes e nível de controle glicêmico. Faz-se necessário programas públicos de prevenção, diagnóstico e tratamento precoce que visam a melhora do prognóstico da RD, bem como a redução do risco de dano visual irreversível. Desse modo, no presente estudo foram analisados dados extraídos de prontuários referentes aos pacientes previamente diagnosticados com DM2, que participaram do mutirão de retinopatia diabética ocorrido em 02/07/2022, residentes de Vespasiano, Minas Gerais, que realizam tratamento nas unidades básicas de saúde ou com médicos endocrinologistas do município. Tais dados coletados tem como objetivo primário avaliar a prevalência da retinopatia diabética nessa população.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of Health ReviewSame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207