The <i>Allium cepa</i> comet assay for environmental sample assessment: a scoping review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purposes of this review were to investigate the application of the comet assay in Allium cepa root cells to assess the genotoxicity of environmental samples and to analyse the experimental procedures employed. A literature search was performed selecting articles published between January 2000 and October 2023 from online databases using the combined search terms 'comet assay' and 'A. cepa'. Only 18 papers met the inclusion criteria. None of these were published in the first eight years (2000-2007), highlighting the increasing interest in using the comet assay on A. cepa to analyse environmental samples over the last decade. The majority of the selected studies (15/18, 83%) were performed on samples belonging to the water compartment on onion bulbs. Half of the selected studies (9/18) were conducted to demonstrate the DNA damaging effect of the sample, while the other half of the studies not only recognized the presence of genotoxic agents but also addressed possible remediation measures. Detailed analysis of the experimental procedures revealed heterogeneity in many key steps, such as exposure time, test controls, nuclei isolation solutions, duration of electrophoresis, and number of nuclei scored. This literature review has shown that the comet assay on A. cepa, although recognized as an appropriate tool, is underutilized in environmental toxicology. Greater standardization could lead to its more widespread use, providing valuable information on the genotoxicity of environmental samples and the ability of different processes to mitigate their negative effects on plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it