MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401857860 · doi:10.1093/botlinnean/boae056

An expanded <i>Pappostipa</i> (Stipeae, Poaceae) includes a lineage of South American species with plumose-like awns

2024· article· en· W4401857860 on OpenAlexafffund
Silvana M. Sede, Daniel Testoni, Sergio E. Sclovich, Santiago Morello, Franco Santin, Konstantin Romaschenko, Julian R. Starr, Liliana M. Giussani

Bibliographic record

VenueBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsBiologyPoaceaeLineage (genetic)BotanyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Generic delimitation within the tribe Stipeae has been a dynamic process since the late 1980s. In this study, we focus on a morphologically cohesive group of Jarava species with plumose-like awns that previous phylogenetic studies suggested were sister to the genus Pappostipa and only distantly related to Jarava sensu stricto. To test this hypothesis, we broadened species sampling, analysed lemma epidermal patterns, and performed molecular phylogenetic analyses using the nuclear ITS region and three plastid (rpl32-trnL, rps16-trnK, rps16 intron) markers. Phylogenetic results confirmed the close relationship of Jarava species with plumose awns (i.e., the Ptilostipa clade) to species of Pappostipa, forming a well-supported clade (C subclade). This result is supported by lemma epidermal patterns in the Ptilostipa clade that are similar to the ‘Maize-like’ pattern of the Achnatherum subtype found in Pappostipa. Consequently, we expand Pappostipa to include three species of Jarava (i.e., Pappostipa neaei, comb. nov., P. pogonathera, comb. nov., and P. psylantha, comb. nov.) and we place them in a new section, Pappostipa sect. Ptilostipa, sect. nov. Moreover, we provide new diagnostic features for Pappostipa, including drawings and photographs illustrating floret morphology, lemma epidermal surfaces, species’ habit, and notes on distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanical Journal of the Linnean SocietySame topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207