MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401863136 · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671549

Multi-task Conditional Attention Network for Conversion Prediction in Logistics Advertising

2024· article· en· W4401863136 on OpenAlexaff
Baoshen Guo, Xining Song, Shuai Wang, Wei Gong, Tian He, Xue Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRecommender Systems and Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTask (project management)PurchasingPreferenceOnline and offlineBusinessMarketingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Logistics advertising is an emerging task in online-to-offline logistics systems, where logistics companies expand parcel shipping services to new users through advertisements on shopping websites. Compared to existing online e-commerce advertising, logistics advertising has two significant new characteristics: (i) the complex factors in logistics advertising considering both users' offline logistics preference and online purchasing profiles; and (ii) data sparsity and mutual relations among multiple steps due to longer advertising conversion processes. To address these challenges, we design MCAC, a Multi-task Conditional Attention network-based logistics advertising Conversion prediction framework, which consists of (i) an offline shipping preference extraction model to extract the user's offline logistics preference from historical shipping records, and (ii) a multi-task conditional attention-based conversion rate prediction module to model mutual relations among multiple steps in logistics advertising conversion processes. We evaluate and deploy MCAC on one of the largest e-commerce platforms in China for logistics advertising. Extensive offline experiments show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in various metrics. Moreover, the conversion rate prediction results of large-scale online A/B testing show that MCAC achieves a 15.22% improvement compared to existing industrial practices, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRecommender Systems and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207