OPA1 mediates cardiac function and metabolism: in silico and in vivo evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract OPA1 is an inner mitochondrial membrane protein that mediates diverse signaling processes. OPA1 is important for cardiac function and protects against cardiac insults such as ischemia reperfusion injury. We sought to further assess OPA1 in human and mouse cardiac pathologies, hypothesizing that OPA1 may also function in a protective manner in chronic heart failure. Bioinformatic analyses of histological and transcript data from the GTEx database indicated that OPA1 expression levels vary in the human heart, where elevated OPA1 transcript levels were correlated with fatty acid, branch chain amino acid and contractile gene signatures. To experimentally assess these correlations, mice with a 1.5-fold whole body OPA1 overexpression (OPA1-OE) were subjected to transverse aortic constriction surgery and displayed improved 2D and 4D cardiac functional parameters compared to WT mice. OPA1-OE mice had no induction of fibrotic transcript markers and displayed sustained transcript levels of fatty acid, branch chain amino acid and contractile markers. Maximal oxidative capacity was sustained in both WT and OPA1-OE cardiac myofibers post-TAC. These results further demonstrate the important role of OPA1 in mediating cardiac function and highlight protective signaling pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".