MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401867699 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggae269

Structure of the crust and upper mantle in Greenland and northeastern Canada: insights from anisotropic Rayleigh-wave tomography

2024· article· en· W4401867699 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Parviz Ajourlou, F. A. Darbyshire, Pascal Audet, Glenn A. Milne

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of OttawaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDiscovery Eye Foundation
KeywordsGeologyLithosphereCratonCrustMantle (geology)SeismologySeismic tomographyTectonicsGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Seismic velocity models provide important constraints on Greenland’s deep structure, which, in turn, has profound implications for our understanding of the tectonic history of this region. However, the resolution of seismic models has been limited by a sparse network, particularly in northern and central Greenland. We address these limitations by generating new high-resolution Rayleigh-wave phase velocity maps encompassing Greenland and northeastern Canada by processing over three decades of teleseismic earthquake records and incorporating recently added stations in Greenland and Arctic Canada. These phase velocity maps are sensitive to structure from the lower crust down to the sub-lithospheric mantle (25–185 s period). We find significant heterogeneity and a strong correlation between isotropic and anisotropic seismic velocities with inferred geological structure. High seismic velocities associated with cratonic lithosphere are broadly divided into two regions, with a belt of reduced velocity spanning central Greenland, which we interpret as lithospheric erosion resulting from interaction between the Greenland continental keel and the Iceland plume. Within each region, we identify tectonic subdivisions that suggest fundamental differences between the blocks that make up Precambrian Greenland. In the south, the North Atlantic craton (NAC) has a high-velocity keel exhibiting anisotropic stratification. Between the NAC and the cratonic lithosphere further north, the Proterozoic Nagssugtoqidian orogenic belt shows a distinct signature of reduced seismic velocity to $\sim$75 s period, but then appears to pinch out at depth. The northern Greenland lithosphere exhibits significant isotropic heterogeneity, with a distinct core of high velocities in the northwest ($\sim$55–75 s period) giving way to a set of distinct east-west trending high-velocity belts at longer periods. At all periods sensitive to the lithospheric mantle in this region, anisotropic fast orientations are E–W, consistent with a north–south Precambrian assembly of the Greenland shield. In contrast to the NAC, there is no evidence of anisotropic stratification in the northern part of the cratonic keel. Based on both isotropic and anisotropic phase-velocity anomalies, we suggest that the Phanerozoic Caledonian and Ellesmerian-Franklinian fold belts are relatively thin-skinned features onshore Greenland, though the Caledonian belt may have a stronger signature off the east coast. At the longest periods, a prominent low-velocity anomaly initially centred on Iceland migrates northwards and spreads beneath central-eastern Greenland. Coupled with NW–SE trending anisotropy, this feature is interpreted as the effect of mantle flow radiating outward from the Iceland plume and interacting with the eroded Greenland lithosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207