Deep learning for detecting prenatal alcohol exposure in pediatric brain MRI: a transfer learning approach with explainability insights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) refers to the exposure of the developing fetus due to alcohol consumption during pregnancy and can have life-long consequences for learning, behavior, and health. Understanding the impact of PAE on the developing brain manifests challenges due to its complex structural and functional attributes, which can be addressed by leveraging machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches. While most ML and DL models have been tailored for adult-centric problems, this work focuses on applying DL to detect PAE in the pediatric population. This study integrates the pre-trained simple fully convolutional network (SFCN) as a transfer learning approach for extracting features and a newly trained classifier to distinguish between unexposed and PAE participants based on T1-weighted structural brain magnetic resonance (MR) scans of individuals aged 2-8 years. Among several varying dataset sizes and augmentation strategy during training, the classifier secured the highest sensitivity of 88.47% with 85.04% average accuracy on testing data when considering a balanced dataset with augmentation for both classes. Moreover, we also preliminarily performed explainability analysis using the Grad-CAM method, highlighting various brain regions such as corpus callosum, cerebellum, pons, and white matter as the most important features in the model's decision-making process. Despite the challenges of constructing DL models for pediatric populations due to the brain's rapid development, motion artifacts, and insufficient data, this work highlights the potential of transfer learning in situations where data is limited. Furthermore, this study underscores the importance of preserving a balanced dataset for fair classification and clarifying the rationale behind the model's prediction using explainability analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".