Experimental and theoretical investigation on vibrational, electronic, and docking characteristics of 1-(3-nitro-phenyl)-5-phenyl-penta-2,4-dien-1-one (1NP5PP)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 1-(3-nitro-phenyl)-5-phenyl-penta-2,4-dien-1-one (1NP5PP) molecule is subjected to detailed spectroscopic investigation by analyzing the spectra obtained by FT-IR and FT-Raman methods. The computational analysis were performed at DFT level using B3LYP/6-311++G(d, p) basis set. With the support of potential energy distribution the entire vibrational assignment was conducted. A frontier molecular orbital study reveals energy gap is small for the molecule. Molecular electrostatic potential surface shows that highest electronegative around oxygen atom in ethylenic bridge and electropositive region spreads through all the hydrogen atoms in the molecule. Natural bond orbital, nonlinear optical analysis, and Fukui function studies were conducted for the present molecule. The electron distribution and reactive site on the surface of the molecule were analyzed using electron localization function and localized orbital locator analysis. In molecular docking studies the interaction observed between MPRO and the 1NP5PP ligand shows the good degree of inhibition. The above mentioned analogy reflects that 1NP5PP has adequate biological properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".