Fast Successive-Cancellation Decoding of 2 × 2 Kernel Non-Binary Polar Codes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-binary polar codes (NBPCs) decoded by successive cancellation (SC) algorithm have remarkable bit-error-rate performance compared to the binary polar codes (BPCs). Due to its serial nature, SC decoding suffers from long latency. The latency issue in BPCs has been the topic of extensive research and it has been notably resolved by the introduction of fast SC-based decoders. However, the latency problem of NBPCs is mainly untouched and the vast majority of research on NBPCs is devoted to issues concerning design and efficient implementation. In this paper, we propose fast SC decoding for NBPCs constructed based on$2\times 2$kernels. In particular, we extend the special nodes of BPCs to their non-binary counterpart and define various non-binary special nodes in the SC decoding tree of NBPCs and propose their fast decoding. This way, we avoid traversing the full decoding tree and significantly reduce the decoding delay compared to symbol-by-symbol SC decoding. We also propose a simplified NBPC structure that facilitates the procedure of non-binary fast SC decoding. Using our proposed fast non-binary decoder, we observe an improvement of more than 96% in latency concerning the original SC decoding. This is while our proposed fast SC decoder for NBPCs incurs no error-rate loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".