Fast NMPC Design for Image-Based Visual Servoing of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new approach to image-based visual servoing (IBVS) for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) with the goal of improved performance and computational efficiency. Traditional IBVS methods, when combined with Model Predictive Control (MPC), face high computational demands due to the nonlinear dynamics and the large degrees of freedom (DOFs) in the variables of the associated optimization problem. Our method addresses this by reducing the DOFs of the optimization variable in the cost function while maintaining a good control performance. To further consider the smoothness of the MPC control signal, a soft constraint handling method is developed. The fast nonlinear MPC, combined with smoother control trajectories and effective constraint handling, makes our method particularly suitable for AUV IBVS applications in dynamic environments. Comparisons with standard strategies confirm the improved performance of our approach in terms of both speed and trajectory quality. Simulation results show that our approach can achieve an improved computation up to 100 times faster than conventional MPC-based IBVS methods, which highlights the great potential for real-time IBVS applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".