MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401919047 · doi:10.31857/s0026364824020062

Unique findings of <i>Phoma</i>-like fungi associated with soybean

2024· article· en· W4401919047 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
М. М. Гомжина, Е. Л. Гасич

Bibliographic record

VenueМикология и фитопатология · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhomaBiologyHorticultureBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ascochyta leaf blight of soybean is a widespread disease caused by several closely related Phoma-like species, this disease often leads to significant crop losses. Among Phoma-like species from Didymellaceae family, the most frequently associated with symptomatic soybean tissues are species of the genera Boeremia and Didymella. Currently reliable species identification in Didymellaceae relies on polyphasic approach based on consolidated species concept and combined molecular phylogenetic, micromorphological and cultural features. At least three loci are commonly used for reconstruction of the molecular phylogeny of Didymellaceae: internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the ribosomal DNA, partial RNA-polymerase II gene (rpb2), and β-tubulin (tub2). As a result of long-term phytosanitary monitoring of soybean crops, soybean leaves with symptoms of Ascochyta blight were collected from major soybean producing areas of Russia. From surface sterilized plant tissues more than 100 isolates of Phoma-like fungi were obtained and stored in the collection of pure cultures of the Laboratory of Mycology and Phytopathology (MF, All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection). Most of them, as a result of multilocus phylogenetic analysis, were identified as Boeremia and Didymella species. Eight isolates were identified as species of other genera, suspected to be rare findings. The aim of this study was to identify these eight isolates based on multilocus phylogenetic analysis, as well micromorphological, cultural, and pathogenicity data. Multilocus phylogenetic analysis has resulted in identification of all eight isolates to species level. Single isolate from the Ryazan region was Neoascochyta graminicola. Three other from three different districts of the Amur region were Remotididymella capsici. Two isolates from the Primorskiy territory and Amur region were Stagonosporopsis heliopsidis. Another two from two districts of the Amur region were S. stuijvenbergii. Pathogenicity tests have resulted in conclusion, that all studied isolates were not pathogenic for soybean leaves. Probably, these Phoma-like species are associate with soybean as saprophytes or endophytes. For all these Phoma-like species Glycine max was detected as substrate for the first time. Neoascochyta graminicola is widespread in Europe in association with Poaceae plants. There are only two findings of Remotididymella capsici in the world, both from leaves of Capsicum annuum. First finding was made in the former USSR in 1977 and was identified based on only morphological features. Second findings was collected in the Fiji and verified with multilocus phylogenetic analysis. Stagonosporopsis heliopsidis isolates were revealed in the USA, Canada, Netherlands and Russia and this fungus was believed to be specific for Asteraceae plants. Isolates of Stagonosporopsis stuijvenbergii are known only from soil in the Netherlands. Thus, such species as Neoascochyta graminicola and Stagonosporopsis stuijvenbergii were revealed in the Russia for the first time. Studied Remotididymella capsici isolates were first confirmed findings of this fungus in Russia. Additionally to detailed phylogenetic data, the manuscript is supplement with a detailed description of the cultural and micromorphological features of all species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueМикология и фитопатология→Same topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases→French-language works237,207→