MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401920643 · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.870

Quality of Life Assessment in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

2024· article· en· W4401920643 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Feki, I. Sellami, F. Ellouze, Mohamad Faizul Yahya, S. Baklouti, M.H. Elleuch

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisQuality of life (healthcare)MedicinePhysical therapyQuality (philosophy)Physical medicine and rehabilitationAlternative medicinePathologyPhilosophyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Osteoarthritis is one of the most common diseases and a leading cause of functional limitation and dependence, significantly impacting the quality of life (QOL). Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of knee osteoarthritis on QOL and identify associated factors. Methods This prospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in the Physical Medicine and Functional Rehabilitation Department over a 4-month period, involving patients with symptomatic bilateral knee osteoarthritis (according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria). Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, and characteristics of knee osteoarthritis were collected. The assessment of QOL and the functional impact of knee osteoarthritis were based on the KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) self-questionnaire, Lequesne Index, and modified WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) Score. The KOOS questionnaire included 5 subscales: pain (KOOS-Pain), symptoms other than pain (KOOS-Symptoms), activities of daily living (KOOS-ADL), sports and recreational function (KOOS-Sport), and QOL (KOOS-QOL). Results We included 30 patients with an average age of 59.27±6.3; the male-to-female ratio was 0.15. Sixty percent of patients lived in urban areas, with varying levels of education: primary (n=10), secondary (n=4), and university (n=4), while the majority were illiterate (40%). Most of our patients were employed, with 64.28% engaging in significant physical activity, resulting in an average of 6±2 days of work absenteeism every 3 months due to knee pain. The mean duration of knee osteoarthritis was 7.97 years±3.14. The average pain visual analog scale (VAS) score was 5.2±0.4. Knee osteoarthritis was classified as stage 2 in 40% and stage 3 in 60% of cases. Regarding functional impact, the mean WOMAC global index was 16.6±4.68, and the mean Lequesne Index was 11.05±3.45; moderate disability was observed in 16.7%, significant disability in 50%, and severe disability in 16.7% of patients. Furthermore, the KOOS questionnaire revealed decreased KOOS-Sport and KOOS-QOL scores, with mean values of 35±10.2 and 37±8.9, respectively. Our study identified factors associated with a poor quality of life: age > 65 years (p<0.05), disease duration (p=0.02), and VAS pain > 5 (p=0.02). Conclusions Improving the quality of life is an essential therapeutic goal in managing knee osteoarthritis. Our study demonstrates that advanced age, longer disease duration, and high pain intensity can negatively impact quality of life. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean PsychiatrySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207