Understanding the Complex Relationship Between Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Psychosocial Factors in Schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Insensitivity to pain in schizophrenia is a complex phenomenon. Understanding schizophrenia’s heterogeneity is crucial for personalized treatments. Objectives Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia often experience gastrointestinal issues and exhibit elevated levels of depression and anxiety. There is an urgent need to understand how these factors interact and how childhood traumas, a significant risk factor for schizophrenia, can affect gastrointestinal symptoms in these individuals. Methods The study involved 51 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia. The hierarchical cluster analysis on the principal components (HCPC) was performed to identify groups of similar observations for test scores and the overall results for 14 tests. Hierarchical clustering was performed using Ward’s minimum variance method. Differences in the results of individual tests between clusters were estimated using the V test. Results The schizophrenia group was categorized into three clusters. The patients belonging to the first cluster are characterized by high GAF test scores and low scores on tests for gastrointestinal symptoms, ITQ, CTQ, GHQ-28, STAI, CALGARY, BDI II, SAMPS, SANS, and PANNS. In contrast, patients in the second cluster had scores significantly above the group average on the tests SANS, PANNS, and SAPS and low scores on the tests DBZ RZ, CTQ, STAI, BDI II, ITQ, and GAF. Finally, patients in the third cluster had high scores on the tests BDI II, ITQ, STAI, CTQ, GHQ 28, DBZ RZ, gastrointestinal symptoms, TEC PL, CALGARY, and CISS. High CTQ scores may contribute to increased GSSR scores due to childhood trauma’s potential to trigger chronic stress, affect the nervous system, and induce psychosomatic symptoms, including gastrointestinal problems. Elevated BDI II and STAI scores can also impact GSSR results by disrupting the connection between emotions and the gastrointestinal system. Conclusions This research underscores the intricate interplay of various psychosocial and physiological factors that influence the perception of pain related to gastrointestinal symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".