MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401924124 · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.625

Clinical features of suicidal behaviouг in youth with borderline personality disorder

2024· article· en· W4401924124 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
В. Г. Каледа, A. Kuleshov, E S Krylova

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBorderline personality disorderPsychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatryPersonalityPsychotherapistPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Borderline personality disorder (BPD) in youth has the greatest spectrum of psychopathology and is strictly associated with nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidal behaviour [Guile et al. Adolesc Health Med Ther 2018; 9 199-210; Paris Med. 2019; 55(6):223]. The formation of autoaggressive behaviour and suicidal activity is due to the psychopathological features of BPD, which include affective instability, impulsivity and impaired self-identity. Objectives The aim of the study was to investigate the psychopathological features of suicidal behaviour in BPD in youth. Methods Clinical and psychopathological examination with assessment of suicidal behaviour at the time of, 6 and 12 months later. For additional psychometric examination of patients we used: SCID-II questionnaires, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), Toronto Alexithymic Scale (TAS), Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Sample: N=62 male and female youth males and females in two equal groups of 31, respectively, with an established diagnosis of BPD and the presence of suicidal behaviour. The mean age of first referral in both groups was 19.1±2.2 years. Results This study defined 2 variants of suicidal behaviour in patients with BPD in youth: 1) Expansive - with predominance of impulsiveness (BIS-11 70±3), affective instability, associated with psychosocial factors as a trigger of suicidal activity. Suicidal attempts were made at the height of psychoemotional stress. These patients were characterised by moderately high scores of the C-SSRS scale 2±1, in which patients noted the absence of a plan and specific intentions before the attempt, and a lower incidence of repeated attempts after 6 ((N=6 (19.4%) and 12 months N=10 (32.2%). 2) Rationalistic variant of suicidal behaviour was found in patients with predominance of self-identification disorders, dissociative disorders and high level of alexithymia TAS 81±4.2 in the clinical picture. Suicidal ideation was revealed in all patients, often throughout the entire youth period, and attempts were characterised by thoughtfulness and led to severe consequences, including fatal outcome. Patients with rationalistic variant of suicidal activity had higher C-SSRS scale scores of 4±1, with the presence of suicidal intentions and high frequency of attempt recurrence after 6 (N=11 (35.5%) and 12 months (N=17 (54.8%)). Conclusions The variant of suicidal behaviour depended on the degree of severity and correlation of the psychopathological structure of BPD in youth. Less favourable prognosis was characteristic of the rationalistic variant due to the high frequency of repeated attempts. The results obtained require further analysis and contribute to the development of differentiated therapeutic strategies. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean PsychiatrySame topicPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyFrench-language works237,207