MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401926636 · doi:10.1039/d4nr02793k

Liposome biodistribution mapping with <i>in vivo</i> X-ray fluorescence imaging

2024· article· en· W4401926636 on OpenAlexafffund
Giovanni Marco Saladino, Po‐Han Chao, Bertha Brodin, Shyh‐Dar Li, Hans M. Hertz

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAppendix Cancer Pseudomyxoma Peritonei Research FoundationKarolinska InstitutetCanadian Cancer SocietyCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNanoMedicines Innovation Network
KeywordsBiodistributionLiposomeIn vivoFluorescenceNanotechnologyMaterials scienceBiophysicsMedical physicsChemistryMedicineOpticsPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

biodistribution of Ru-Lipo in mice, enabling tumor detection and longitudinal studies with elemental specificity and resolution down to the sub-millimeter scale. Quantitative XRF computed tomography on extracted organs permits targeting efficiency evaluations. These findings highlight the promising role of XRF imaging in pharmacokinetic studies and theranostic applications for the rapid optimization of drug delivery and assessment of targeting efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207