MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401930391 · doi:10.18280/jesa.570404

Investigation of Welding Heat Input Influences on the Characteristics of Welded Joint of Storage Tank Wall Using Multiple Passes

2024· article· en· W4401930391 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samir Amin, Ahmed Hashim Kareem, Ismail Ibrahim Marhoon, Diana Abd Alkareem Noori Kattab, Hasan Sh. Majdi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeldingJoint (building)Storage tankMaterials scienceStructural engineeringComposite materialMechanical engineeringMetallurgyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The correlation of welding input heat and microstructure and its impacts on multi-pass mechanical properties in storage tanks alloy steel plate of thickness 6mm using multiple passes SMAW was investigated experimentally and using SOLIDWORKS and ANSYS thermal and Mechanical Simulator.The heat-affected zone (HAZ) dimension was calculated, and the deformation in each pass was also calculated.Optical microscopy was used to characterize the weld metal microstructure effects on joint mechanical properties, the effects of the three pass sequences in deformation, and the resulting alterations in weld metal microstructure.In addition, the impact of this alteration in corrosion resistance characteristics was investigated, and steel samples were simulated.The investigation results illustrated increasing the weldment deformation with increasing heat inputs in the three-pass sequence.The welding joint microstructure shows a big difference in M-A (martensite-austenite) phase formation between the first, second, and third pass microstructure.In addition, the microstructure examinations showed the formation of AF (acicular ferrite) in the third pass, with a higher percentage in the second and first pass.This research demonstrated scientific information about the expected deformation of each pass from the three welding joints, the alteration in microstructures, and the corrosion resistance of the weldment according to the alteration with welding heat input.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicWelding Techniques and Residual StressesFrench-language works237,207