MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Time-varying Microwave Photonic Filter over 46-GHz Bandwidth with High Tuning Speed

2024· article· en· W4401943410 on OpenAlexaff
Xinyi Zhu, Benjamin Crockett, M. Röwe, Hao Sun, José Azaña

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBandwidth (computing)MicrowavePhotonicsOptical filterOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringMicrowave transmissionComputer scienceMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-varying (TV) filters, with the ability to precisely process non-stationary high-speed microwave signals, are fundamental building blocks in wireless communications, Radar/Lidar systems, advanced metrology, etc. [1]–[3]. To date, it remains challenging to achieve time-varying microwave filters with fully reconfigurable spectral transfer functions, large tuning bandwidth (>10GHz), and high tuning speed (into the GHz range) simultaneously. This set of specifications are particularly interesting for applications in 5G/6G and cognitive communications. For example, digital TV filters can achieve hyperfine frequency resolution and high reconfigurability; however, their real-time processing bandwidth is inherently limited to below a few hundreds of MHz [4], [5]. Recently, significant efforts have been devoted to the development of TV microwave filters through the microwave photonics (MWP) approach, so-called MWP filters (MWPFs), as these have been shown to enable broad operation bandwidth, fast tuning speed and an important degree of flexibility. However, current TV MPFs still fall short of the set of specifications defined above, being particularly limited in regards to their versatility and tuning speed [6], [7]. For example, a notable level of reconfigurability can be achieved by cascading an optical frequency comb source and a programmable optical filter, but the reconfiguration speed is still limited by the tuning speed <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(\sim$</tex> kHz) of the programmable optical filter [6]. On the other hand, a tuning speed of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$\sim 1$</tex> GHz has been demonstrated using other approaches, but in these solutions the degree of reconfigurability is still fairly limited [7].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207