Triage-Bot: An Assistive Triage Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prompt delivery of healthcare services is critical for saving lives. Streamlining the collection of patients’ health data through automation can minimize waiting times in emergency departments and enhance access to evidence-based care. We propose an innovative solution, Triage-Bot, which leverages the latest advancements in Artificial Intelligence to elevate the standard of patient care. Triage-Bot is a software as-a-service that allows patients or their caregivers to authenticate themselves by presenting their faces to the camera and also using a registered user ID and password. They can communicate about their health situation through voice, chat, and video conversations securely with the robot service to request medical attention. Moreover, Triage-Bot automatically captures vital signs from facial video. Voice data is converted to text to extract a concise summary of the patient’s health condition, while emotions are detected from both text and video data. The processed patient information is linked to the patients’ Electronic Medical Records to automatically classify the patients into one of the five severity level as defined by the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. Currently, we are working on the evaluation of the services by medical professionals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".