Autoinhibition of ubiquitin-specific protease 8: Insights into domain interactions and mechanisms of regulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) are a family of multi-domain deubiquitinases (DUBs) with variable architectures, some containing regulatory auxiliary domains. Among the USP family, all occurrences of intramolecular regulation presently known are autoactivating. USP8 remains the sole exception as its putative WW-like domain, conserved only in vertebrate orthologs, is autoinhibitory. Here, we present a comprehensive structure-function analysis describing the autoinhibition of USP8 and provide evidence of the physical interaction between the WW-like and catalytic domains. The solution structure of full-length USP8 reveals an extended, monomeric conformation. Coupled with DUB assays, the WW-like domain is confirmed to be the minimal autoinhibitory unit. Strikingly, autoinhibition is only observed with the WW-like domain in cis and depends on the length of the linker tethering it to the catalytic domain. Modeling of the WW:CD complex structure and mutagenesis of interface residues suggests a novel binding site in the S1 pocket. To investigate the interplay between phosphorylation and USP8 autoinhibition, we identify AMP-activated protein kinase as a highly selective modifier of S718 in the 14-3-3 binding motif. We show that 14-3-3γ binding to phosphorylated USP8 potentiates autoinhibition in a WW-like domain-dependent manner by stabilizing an autoinhibited conformation. These findings provide mechanistic details on the autoregulation of USP8 and shed light on its evolutionary significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".