MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4401947038 · doi:10.7759/cureus.68029

myoActivation®, a Structured Assessment and Therapeutic Process for Adolescents With Myofascial Dysfunction and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Case Series

2024· article· en· W4401947038 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica Y. Luo, Nicholas West, Gillian Lauder

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalCanadian Association of Nurses in OncologyUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMoodPhysical therapyQuality of life (healthcare)Chronic painMedical recordDepression (economics)Pain assessmentMyofascial pain syndromePain managementInternal medicineAlternative medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Myofascial dysfunction is a significant, but often unrecognized, contributor to chronic low back pain (CLBP). myoActivation is an innovative method that utilizes a structured assessment and therapeutic process to recognize and manage myofascial dysfunction and pain. Since 2017, the British Columbia Children's Hospital Complex Pain Service has used myoActivation as a tool in the interdisciplinary care of adolescents with chronic pain. This case series explores the journey to discharge of patients in whom myoActivation was incorporated as part of their CLBP management. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of adolescents reporting CLBP who underwent myoActivation between August 2022 and January 2023 and had subsequently been discharged. Information obtained for analysis included preclinical information (medical/injury/pain history, previous investigations, diagnoses, therapies, and quality of life indicators); clinic recommendations, assessment findings, management strategies, and specifics of the myoActivation process; and reported changes at discharge (quality-of-life measures and medication use). Results Eight cases were reviewed: all female, with a median age (range) of 16.5 (15.7-19.5) years. Before admission, patients had experienced chronic pain for a median duration of 4.3 (1-8) years, had self-reported average pain intensity of 7.5 (4-9) on the 0-10 numeric pain scale, with poor quality-of-life impacts including sleep disturbance (8/8, 100%), school absence (8/8, 100%), and low mood (6/8, 75%). Patients attended three (2-5) myoActivation sessions over two (1-10) weeks. The overall duration of their interdisciplinary care was 12 (7-25) months. At discharge, there were improvements in pain (7/8, 88%), physical functioning (5/8, 63%), sleep (6/8, 75%), school attendance (5/8, 63%), and mood (4/6, 67%) and reduced prescription and over-the-counter medication use in most cases. Conclusion This case series suggests that myoActivation may be a useful clinical tool in the assessment and management of adolescents with myofascial dysfunction and CLBP. Prospective longitudinal research is required to establish evidence that confirms the clinical efficacy of myoActivation within interdisciplinary care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation→French-language works237,207→