The influence of lamination and fracture on the velocity anisotropy of tectonic coals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The elastic anisotropy of coal formations is important for the prediction of unconventional coalbed methane reservoir performance and hydraulic fracturing. Although essential for several geophysical applications, the elastic anisotropy of coals is still poorly understood. Therefore, three sets of cylindrical coal samples are drilled parallel and perpendicular to the bedding plane, and the ultrasonic velocities under different confining pressures are measured in the laboratory. We combine experimental observations and modeling analysis to evaluate the elastic anisotropy of the coals. The results suggest that the velocity of coals parallel to the bedding plane is less sensitive to confining pressure than those perpendicular to the bedding plane. The fracture densities of coals parallel to the bedding plane are much lower than those perpendicular to the bedding plane, and most of the fractures are closed when the pressure is higher than 15 MPa. The organic matter (OM), clay content, and their preferred orientation play dominant roles in velocity anisotropy, and the fracture effect can significantly enhance it. The velocity anisotropy parameters of coals are positively correlated with the OM and clay content, and the preferred orientation of OM and clay plays a significant role in coal anisotropy. The results in this study are helpful in the characterization of the fractures of coals and can provide an important rock-physics basis for microseismic fracture monitoring and reservoir prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".