MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401967220 · doi:10.23917/warta.v27i2.4815

Implementasi Platform Si Cantik Bangsa di Kabupaten Kebumen dalam Pembangunan Desa

2024· article· en· W4401967220 on OpenAlexaff
Arief Rais Bahtiar, Rima Dias Ramadhani, Alfin Hikmaturokhman, Novanda Alim Setya Nugraha, Pradana Ananda Raharja, Novri Anto, Bunga Laelatul Muna, Rehan Nur Setiawan, Moh Lutfi Fadilah, Satya Helfi Agustianto, Yasinta Swasti Mahargyani, Adhi Purwono

Bibliographic record

VenueWarta LPM · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si Cantik Bangsa is a platform that aims to record participation and equality in village development. Through this community service, the focus is emphasized on understanding the problems of women's empowerment in development in three villages, namely Logede Village, Ampelsari Village, and Kaliputih Village in Kebumen Regency. In this context, the main concern is overcoming the significant decline in the Gender Empowerment Index which is a serious challenge faced by the Community and Village Empowerment Service (PMD). In an effort to overcome this problem, the PMD Department introduced an innovative program known as Planning Literacy Women (WANI LEmPER) which is in line with the Sustainable Development goals (SDGs) related to gender equality and women's empowerment. However, even though the WANI LEmPER program has been implemented, there are still obstacles that arise due to cultural resistance and rejection from various parties. Therefore, this service offers a solution through the implementation of Si Cantik Bangsa, an information technology-based platform that aims to document the activities of LEmPER WANI cadres and monitor women's participation. The service results show that indicators of success have been achieved, where 65% of respondents understand the benefits and features of Si Cantik Bangsa, while 25% still do not understand them. Thus, the use of this platform is considered a strategic step in increasing women's empowerment in village development planning to achieve SDGs and Gender Empowerment goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWarta LPMSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207