A Systematic Review of Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes of Xanthoma Disseminatum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Xanthoma disseminatum (XD) is a rare normolipidemic mucocutaneous xanthomatosis within the spectrum of cutaneous non-Langerhans histiocytosis. Managing XD poses substantial challenges, with limited available data. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate existing literature on clinical features of XD and treatment outcomes. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed was performed, using "xanthoma disseminatum" and "Montgomery syndrome" as search terms, without restrictions. Screening was performed in duplicate by 2 reviewers. One hundred fifty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding 166 cases of XD (106 females, 60 males), mean age at diagnosis 35.3 years (range: 9 months-87 years). XD typically presented as yellow-to-brown coalescing papules/plaques and nodules. Distribution affects mainly the face (n = 116/166), flexures (n = 45/166), trunk (n = 65/166), and genitalia/inguinal areas (n = 63/166). Most cases (99.4%; n = 165/166) exhibited extracutaneous manifestations, including the pituitary gland and the oropharynx. Treatment options rendered low complete response rates (CRRs). Treatments with reported outcomes included surgical resection (n = 17/99), systemic steroids (n = 40/99), immunosuppressants/immunomodulators (n = 73/99), energy-based devices (n = 7/99), lipid-lowering agents (n = 24/99), cryotherapy (n = 6/99), lasers (n = 10/99), topical steroids (n = 6/99), oral retinoids (n = 2/99), and radiotherapy (n = 5/99), with CCRs of 23.5% (n = 4/17), 5.0% (n = 2/40), 9.6% (n = 7/73), 14.3% (n = 1/7), 4.2% (n = 1/24), 16.7% (n = 1/6), 10.0% (n = 1/10), 0% (n = 0/6), 0% (n = 0/2), and 0% (n = 0/5), respectively. The most promising therapy is cladribine, with the highest CRR of 27.1% (n = 6/22) and the lowest no response rate (9.1%; n = 2/22) of all reported treatments. This review confirms the high prevalence of systemic manifestations in XD. Treatment options vary widely; thus, further research is needed to establish management strategies for this challenging condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".