Impact of enzymatically derived manno-oligosaccharides on the growth of select lactobacillus strains under aerobic and anaerobic conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study highlights the ability of beta-MOS derived from coconut processing residues (copra meal) to promote the in vitro growth of Lactobacillus probiotics. Enzymatic hydrolysis conditions were manipulated to produce Low Molecular Weight (LMW) and (HMW) Manno-oligosaccharide (MOS) extracts. The LMW MOS contained more mannose and mannobiose, and the HMW MOS contained more mannotriose and higher molecular weight oligosaccharides. The growth of Limosilactobacillus reuteri , Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG on the MOS Extracts was evaluated and compared with growth on Inulin, FOS and XOS. There was significant growth of each probiotic on the MOS extracts. Probiotic growth was similar on MOS extracts and on FOS, while growth was much lower on XOS and Inulin. Probiotic growth was greater under anaerobic than under aerobic conditions. The results confirm the value of a bioactive compound from copra meal to support human and animal health, while contributing to a circular bioeconomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".