Control-Oriented Modeling of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Affected by Redox Cycling Using a Novel Deep Learning Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is a multiphysics system that involves heat transfer, mass transport, and electrochemical reactions to produce electrical power. Reduction and re-oxidation (Redox) cycling is a destructive reaction that can occur during SOFC operation. Redox induces various degradation mechanisms, such as electrode delamination, nickel agglomeration, and microstructural changes, which should be mitigated. The interplay of these mechanisms makes a post-Redox SOFC a nonlinear, time-varying, nonstationary dynamic system. Physics-based modeling of these complexities often leads to computationally expensive equations that are not suitable for the control and diagnostics of SOFCs. Here, a data-driven approach based on dilated convolutions and a self-attention mechanism is introduced to effectively capture the dynamics underlying SOFCs affected by Redox. Controlled Redox cycles are designed to collect appropriate experimental data for developing deep learning models, which are lacking in the current literature. The performance of the proposed model is validated on diverse unseen data sets gathered from different fuel cells and benchmarked against state-of-the-art models, in terms of prediction accuracy and computation complexity. The results indicate 31% accuracy improvement and 27% computation speed enhancement compared to the benchmarks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".