MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401976960 · doi:10.3126/npijst.v1i1.68946

A Case Study on Demodicosis in Golden Retriever

2024· article· en· W4401976960 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
F. Pradhan, Sabita Paudel

Bibliographic record

VenueNPI Journal of Science and Technology. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemodicosisLabrador RetrieverDermatologyMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A six-year-old Golden Retriever dog with a history of alopecia, itching, scratching and erythema all over the body was presented to Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Nepal Polytechnic Institute, Chitwan, Nepal. Dog weighed 44.6 kg was golden brown in colour. On clinical examination mucous membrane, temperature, Heart rate was normal. The eczematous lesions were erythematous and alopecia was seen in the area surrounding the lesions. The case was suspected of parasitic skin infection, and skin scrapping was taken from different affected area until there was a capillary bleeding with the help of scalpel blade after moistening the skin with glycerin. The scraping was treated with 10% KOH until it was submerged after that the solution was gently heated and the supernatant was discarded, and remnants were transferred to slide. A cover slip was placed, and it was examined first under the low power then high power for detail study. Demodex was observed under microscopic examination. The case was diagnosed as patchy demodex infestation with secondary bacterial infection. The lesions were cleaned by medicated ketachonazole shampoo and systemic administration of fixotic advance and Amoxicillin clavunate 375 mg antibiotic was given for secondary bacterial infection. After 2 weeks skin scrapping test was again performed and found negative. There were no red rashes and lesions were slowly healing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPI Journal of Science and Technology.Same topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207