Extreme weather has variable effects on reproductive success of grassland songbirds at the northern extent of their range
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Grassland songbirds breeding in Canada and the United States have experienced significant population declines likely because of habitat loss and degradation. Many climate change models predict an increase in the frequency, intensity, and duration of extreme precipitation and temperature events that could place further pressures on declining species. We monitored the fate of 1,868 individual nesting attempts of 7 grassland songbird species in response to various precipitation and temperature measures over a 10-yr period (1997 to 2002 and 2004 to 2008) in Saskatchewan, Canada. Daily nest survival rates of 5 species, including 3 at-risk species, were negatively influenced by high levels of precipitation, although the amount of precipitation where declines in daily nest survival occurred varied. Daily nest survival rates of 2 species were negatively correlated with high temperatures. We failed to detect any relationship between precipitation or temperature and the number of fledglings produced from successful nests. Extreme weather events could add additional stressors to declining populations of grassland birds in Canada. Increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather, specifically extreme precipitation events and short-term high temperatures, will likely lead to lower reproductive success for several species compared to current levels. This may be especially problematic for management of Anthus spragueii (Sprague’s Pipit) and Centronyx bairdii (Baird’s Sparrow), where a large proportion (> 75%) of the breeding population occurs near the northern edge of the Great Plains. The continuing loss and degradation of northern grasslands may limit the ability of these species to disperse and find favorable climate conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".