MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises Therapy Versus Wii-Based Exergame Therapy in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized Controlled Trial

2024· article· en· W4401979783 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Güler BÜYÜKYILMAZ, Burak Menek, Devrim Tarakçı

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Health Science and Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyRandomized controlled trialMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: One of the most prevalent musculoskeletal conditions that impair function and cause discomfort is osteoarthritis in the knee. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of closed kinetic chain exercises and Wii-based exergame treatment on knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients’ pain, joint range of motion, muscle strength, joint position sense, functioning, and motor performance. Methods: This study included 56 patients diagnosed with knee OA. Participants were randomly divided into 2 groups: a Wii-based exercises (WBE) group and a closed kinetic chain exercise (CKCE) group. Exercises continued 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Participants were examined before the therapy, afterward, and in the eighth week. Pain threshold, joint range of motion, muscle strength, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Timed Up & Go test (TUG), and joint position sense were alternately examined. Results: A statistically significant difference was obtained in pain threshold results after treatment compared to before treatment (P < .05) in the intra-group comparison and at the eighth week (P < .05). After treatment, joint position sense was significantly better in the CKCE group than in the WBE group (P < .05). Statistical significance was achieved in the WOMAC values after treatment in both groups (P < .05). Intragroup comparisons revealed that the improvements in the WOMAC and TUG tests in the WBE group were statistically better than those in the CKCE group (P < .05). In the analysis of the difference between groups after treatment and at week 8, the results were significantly better in the WBE group than in the CKCE group in terms of the TUG test values (P < .05). Conclusion: We concluded that, among patients with knee OA, WBE programs can be of great use for pain reduction and for functionality and balance exercises in rehabilitation. Cite this article as: Büyükyılmaz G, Menek B, Tarakçı D. Closed kinetic chain exercises therapy versus wii-based exergame therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: randomized controlled trial. Arch Health Sci Res. 2024;11(2):133-139.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Health Science and ResearchSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207