Sulfur makeup in an unbleached kraft pulp mill
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sodium sesquisulfate or “sesqui” (Na3H(SO4)2) is a by-product of chlorine dioxide production at kraft pulp mills. It is typically used for sodium and sulfur makeup in the liquor loop. Mondi Hinton Inc. (MHI) in Hinton, AB, Canada, was converting from bleached to unbleached kraft pulp production and was thus losing this source of makeup. The only option that was readily available as a substitute was sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), which was cost prohibitive. Other options such as sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), emulsified sulfur, sulfuric acid (H2SO4), and sodium bisulfite (NaHSO3) were compared. The mill concluded that pelletized sulfur plus sodium hydroxide or “caustic soda” (NaOH) was the best option. Laboratory-scale experiments showed that pelletized sulfur dissolved in white liquor (WL). A mill-scale trial revealed that pelletized sulfur added to a causticizer had no adverse impacts on the downstream pressure filters or kiln operation. The sulfur reacted to produce polysulfide upstream of the WL storage tank, giving the liquor an orange hue. This polysulfide appeared to partially degrade into thiosulfate before being fed to the digester. The heavy black liquor (HBL) sulfur:sodium (S:Na) ratio did not change significantly, even though the sulfur/soda addition location was upstream of the original one. In addition, other properties such as liquor heating value and elemental analysis did not significantly change. Due to polysulfide/thiosulfate concentration in the white liquor, it was determined that the carbon steel equipment was at risk for corrosion. During the annual turnaround that occurred eight months after the addition of sulfur was started, the wash zone of the digester showed no signs of thinning/damage. The mill has been running exclusively with pelletized sulfur for 22 months (as of August 2024), realizing significant cost savings compared to the use of NaHS or other sulfur/soda addition options.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".