MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402008983 · doi:10.1101/2024.08.27.609972

Marine spatial planning to enhance coral adaptive potential

2024· preprint· en· W4402008983 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel L. Forrest, Lisa C. McManus, Edward W. Tekwa, Daniel E. Schindler, Madhavi A. Colton, Michael M. Webster, Helen Fox, Timothy E. Essington, Stephen R. Palumbi, Peter J. Mumby, Lukas B. DeFilippo, Steven R. Schill, F. Joseph Pollock, Malin L. Pinsky

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReefCoral reefCoralHabitatMarine spatial planningMarine ecosystemEcologyEnvironmental scienceResilience of coral reefsEnvironmental issues with coral reefsEffects of global warming on oceansClimate changeEcosystemOceanographyGlobal warmingGeographyGeologyEnvironmental resource managementBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ocean warming interacts with local stressors to negatively affect coral reefs. The adaptive capacity of reefs to survive these stressors is driven by ecological and evolutionary processes occurring at multiple spatial scales. Marine protected area (MPA) networks are one solution that can address both local and regional threats, yet the impacts of MPA network design on adaptive processes remains unclear. In this paper, we used an eco-evolutionary model to simulate hypothetical MPA configurations in the Caribbean, Southwest Pacific and Coral Triangle under projected warming. We found that protecting thermal refugia (i.e., cooler reefs) largely benefited corals inside the refugia while other reefs declined. In contrast, protecting a diverse habitat portfolio led to increased coral cover both inside and outside of the MPA network. We then quantified the thermal habitat and connectivity representations of reefs both inside and outside existing MPA networks across each region. Most strikingly, reefs in current MPA networks in the Southwest Pacific and Coral Triangle are approximately 2 °C cooler than reefs outside the MPA networks, while the Caribbean’s MPA network is approximately 1 °C warmer than reefs outside the network, based on mean temperatures from 2008-2018. These results suggest that the Caribbean MPA network is poised to protect sources of warm-adapted larvae but not destinations, and the opposite is true of the Southwest Pacific and Coral Triangle. Our results suggest that 1) by protecting sites with particular temperature and connectivity characteristics, marine spatial planning may alter eco-evolutionary processes to enhance or inhibit the adaptive capacity of a reef network and 2) the distribution, extent, and effectiveness of local interventions have the potential to affect regional distributions of coral cover beyond what would be expected from local benefits alone, due to the potentially wide-reaching effects of larval dispersal and gene flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies→French-language works237,207→